Puccini’s second opera ‘Edgar’ premiered today

This day in opera history, April 21, 1889, marks the premiere of Puccini’s Edgar in Milan, Italy, an opera that I’ve never seen on anyone’s season schedule here in the U.S.

There are no performances of Edgar listed on Bachtrack.com (the world’s best way to find live classical performance) either.

Me, being the inquisitive creature I am, set out to find out why.

It may not be Puccini’s finest work; however, it’s more likely the opera has languished because the opera world just doesn’t need another Carmen.

Similarities to  Bizet‘s Carmen abound. Both works feature a confused and then tortured young man (tenor: Edgar, Don José) struggling to choose between the pure home town girl (soprano: Fidelia, Micaëla) and the  exotic gypsy (mezzo-soprano: Tigrana, Carmen).

Interestingly, I have found a good film adaptation for you on YouTube and you can watch the entire opera if you have time.

If you love Scarpia’s dramatic entrance music in Tosca, you will also appreciate Tigrana’s entrance music only minutes into the opera.

Notable arias

Act 1

  • “O fior del giorno” — Fidelia
  • “Già il mandorlo vicino” — Fidelia
  • “Questo amor, vergogna mia” — Frank
  • “Tu il cuor mi strazi” — Tigrana

Act 2

  • “Orgia, chimera dall’occhio vitreo” — Edgar
Act 3

  • “Addio, mio dolce amor” — Fidelia
  • “Nel villaggio d’Edgar” — Fidelia
  • “Ah! se scuoter della morte” — Tigrana (4 acts versions)

Act 4

  • “Un’ora almen” — Fidelia

The production you are about to see features the following performers in the lead roles:

Jose Cura
Amarilli Nizza
Julia Gertzeva
Teatro Regio di Torino 07.2008

YouTube Preview Image

What do you think? Puccini lovers will be happy to know it is very Pucciniesque–not like a composer taking on something and not sounding at all like himself. One critic said that Puccini “jumped across an abyss from Edgar to Manon Lescaut,” Puccini’s third opera and first great success.Edgar was a necessary, prepatory step full of redundancies flashes and hints, while Manon is the work of a self-confident genius” (The Autumn of Italian Opera).

However, is Edgar worth presenting more frequently than it is? Is is instructive to see works that illustrate an artist’s or composer’s growth?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Classic Opera, Italian opera, Premieres, verismo opera

New York Opera Exchange gets Così with technology

By setting Così fan tutte in contemporary society, the New York Opera Exchange revitalizes the universal themes of love and fidelity in Mozart’s popular 1790 opera with the frothy story line and the lush music.

Guest Director Cameron J. Marcotte

Their production directed by Cameron J. Marcotte explores how modern technological innovations and current events affect relationships with others.

Four evening performances in collaboration with the Brooklyn Symphony Orchestra are slated for April 26 through the 29th at the Church of the Covenant on 310 E 42ndSt. between 1st Ave and 2nd Ave.

Why contemporize the show? In today’s age of innovation in media, technology colors love.  In a world so fundamentally driven by opinion and social class, opposites attract now more than ever. In this new version of Così fan tutte, the characters live in a complex world where a Facebook relationship status carries as much weight as an eighteenth century marriage contract and where an executive in the one-percent may fall in love with an Occupy Wall Street protestor.

“Our goal is to hold up a mirror to our contemporary audience and reveal, with comical overtones, that this farcical world may not be so different from our own.” — New York Opera Exchange

Soprano Rachel Ann Hippert is sharing the role of Fiordiligi . . .

NY Opera Exchange aims to create performance opportunities with orchestra for young emerging artists on the cusp of professional breakthrough.  They strive to make opera accessible for the diverse New York population, creating a supportive environment for both the musicians and audience. There will be supertitles for the sung Italian and an original English text for the recitative.

The production features two casts:

THURSDAY APRIL 26th at 7PM
SATURDAY APRIL 28th at 7PM

Fiordiligi: Rachel Anne Hippert
Dorabella: Abi Levis
Despina: Amanda Chmela
Ferrando: Justin Werner
Guglielmo: Joe Beckwith
Don Alfonso: Brad Baron
______________________________

. . . with soprano Rebecca Shorstein

FRIDAY, APRIL 27th at 7PM
SUNDAY, APRIL 29th at 6PM

Fiordiligi: Rebecca Shorstein
Dorabella: Kate Wiswell
Despina: Becca Conviser
Ferrando: Jeffrey Taveras
Guglielmo: Bob Balonek
Don Alfonso: Jason Cox
_______________________

Tickets are $25 each ($15 student rush) and are available at the door or in advance at www.nyoperaexchange.com

Leave a Comment

Filed under 21st Century Opera, North American Opera, Opera and humor, opera and irony, opera and technology

Puccini fave at Philly’s Center City Opera

An exciting new production of a classic in downtown Philadelphia

This weekend, Center City Opera Theater presents Giacomo Puccini’s beloved classic opera in four acts for three performances – April 13, 14, & 15 at the Prince Music Theater’s 446-seat mainstage theater. All shows are fully-staged, costumed, and sung in original Italian libretto by members of CCOT’s Young Artist Program.

La Bohème (premiere in 1896) tells the story of a group of young bohemians living in Paris in the 1830’s. A poet named Rodolfo and a painter named Marcello desperately attempt to earn a living off their artistic craft. While Marcello goes out to celebrate with friends at a local cafe one night, Rodolfo stays behind to write and meets a young woman named Mimi whose candle has blown out in the stairwell. The two begin a romance while Rodolfo and his old flame Musetta rekindle their own relationship the very same evening. Various romantic relationships soon begin to crumble under the weight of poverty, jealousy, and disease.

Performances are: Friday, April 13 at 8pm; Saturday, April 14 at 8pm; Sunday, April 15 at 2pm. All three performances are in the Gisele & Dennis Alter Mainstage of the Prince Music Theater, 1412 Chestnut Street in Philadelphia. Directions and parking information can be found at OperaTheater.org. Tickets are $39-79 and can be purchased online at OperaTheater.org.

La Bohème features members of Center City Opera Theater’s Young Artists Program, a program committed to the career development of talented up-and-coming opera stars. In addition to filling the roster for La Bohème – as well as The Marriage of Figaro this past February – many of these artists perform in CCOT’s upcoming productions of Il Postino and Slaying the Dragon. “Symphony in C” will accompany the singers as Center City Opera Theater’s orchestra for the 2011-2012 season.

CAST
Rodolfo: David Koh (4/13, 4/15); Christopher Lorge (4/14)
Mimi: Sarah Beckham (4/13, 4/15); Jennifer Hoffmann (4/14)
Marcello: Paul Corujo (4/13, 4/15); Norman Garrett (4/14)
Schaunard: Norman Garrett (4/13, 4/15); Paul Corujo (4/14)
Colline: Martin Hargrove (4/13, 4/15); Andrew Hiers (4/14)
Musetta: Jennifer Braun
Alcindoro/Benoit: Roland Burks
Stage Director: Sandra Hartman (CCOT debut)
Conductor: Andrew M. Kurtz
Lighting Designer: Andrew Cowles
Costume Designer: Amy Chemielewski
Scenic Designer: Danielle McDonald

Leave a Comment

Filed under 21st Century Opera, Classic Opera, Opera Marketing, Regional opera

my nearly first exposure to opera . . . one blogger’s confession

I was accepted into AMDA in 1975

In the fall of 1976, I moved to Manhattan to study musical theater. Manhattan was a lonely place but everything was new and my life was busy, so I was distracted from my isolation. During my first semester at the American Musical Theater Academy, the program director assigned all the students to a voice teacher. That I was placed with Mrs. Florence Bower was providential. Mrs. Bower was the best teacher, and rumor had it, she  was always awarded the best singers.

I loved my singing lessons with my Julliard-trained teacher, who was precise and demanding but kind, always kind. I was less enthused by the pieces Mrs. Bower picked out for me to sing—everything was always high soprano. I thought I was a mezzo. Thanks to Mrs. Bower, I found a two-octave range I never knew I had.

To listen to Mrs. Bower speak, one might think she was British because she had an affected pronunciation reminding me of Katherine Hepburn—the well-bred American girl intonation. Maybe it was a lifetime of using open vowel sounds of classically trained singers. Or maybe she had grown up on Long Island.

“Gale, deah, I desperately need some help keeping my apartment clean. Morris is just fed up with all the cluttah,” Mrs. Bower said one day before my lesson started, because at seventy-three, she taught at the academy and gave private lessons at home and was too busy to clean her apartment herself. “I would need them every other Saturday, say elevenish, to two or three. Could you ahsk around, say something to your friends?”

“I could do it. I’d like to help you,” I said.

For the rest of the school year and into the next, I, an eighteen-year-old Broadway-actress-wannabe, was nurtured by Mrs. Bowers’  bi-weekly respite. Every other Saturday, our routine was the same. I dusted and tidied the front rooms, we had lunch together, then I cleaned the rooms in the back of the apartment. Mrs. Bower liked routine, so I could expect to finish up by three o’clock.

Typically, I would get in no more than thirty minutes of cleaning when Mrs. Bower’s well-supported vocal tones called me to the kitchen.

“Gale, deah, why don’t you take a break? Let’s have some lunch togethah?”

Mrs. Bower fixed us each a sandwich on fresh bread, a deli salad, always a Kosher pickle, and a Cadbury bar, usually with fruit and nuts.

“What are your challenges, my deah?” Mrs. Bower asked.

“I’d like to learn how to sing over the break in my register,” I explained, enjoying my sandwich. “This is good. What is it? Salami?”

“It’s tongue. Do you like it?”

Loaded question. I liked tongue but thought Mrs. Bower had no interest in discussing French kissing over her dinette set that afternoon.

It was more the idea of eating something of an animal’s that could eat you back that bothered me, much more than the taste of the tongue itself, which tasted pretty good. I would be polite and finish my sandwich. My dad had spent seventeen years making me eat things against my will—burnt pigeon stew, chicken-fried groundhog, puff mushroom steaks, liver and onions—so I was a pro. Because Mrs. Bower had been nice enough to make it for me, I would finish my plate.

“Between my chest voice and my head voice. There’s an obvious difference in vocal quality,” I explained.

“You are a stage singah,” Mrs. Bower would allow. “But you should sing everything in your head range. You could sing classically, if you really wanted to study.”

Saturday afternoon at the Met

On a bi-weekly basis, Mrs. Bower preached to me about the virtues of classical music and opera: Hadn’t Mrs. Bower and her daughter Bijou traveled the world thanks to opera? The proselytizing continued after lunch with “Saturday at the Met” which played from the clock radio in the bedroom every Saturday I cleaned for her.

Though I didn’t dare confess it, I had never wanted to be an opera singer, never taking to opera despite Mrs. Bower’s best efforts. Nevertheless, I did grow to love some of the music Mrs. Bower introduced me to, especially The Brandenberg Concerti and other works by Bach, Vivaldi, and Wagner.

Once in scene study, I was assigned a Tennessee Williams’ one-act that called for me to say the line, “Vivaldi is a very thin shadow of Bach.” I couldn’t wait to share that line with Mrs. Bower.

The next day, I raced up Central Park West. I looked out-of-place running along a residential street, weaving in and out of the strollers and walkers streaming from the park, chanting to myself. People usually ran in the park, not down the facing sidewalk in street clothes. But it was New York after all—strangeness was not only tolerated but expected. The Big Apple was a magnet for uncommon ejaculations: “Ooh,” passing Lincoln Center at night. “Ahh,” watching the laser show in the Museum of Natural History planetarium theater. “Oh,” waiting in the rain for a crosstown bus. “Eew,” stepping into something that squished on the sidewalk.

“So what does that line mean?”I asked Mrs. Bower. “‘Vivaldi is a very thin shadow of Bach.’”

“Uttah nonsense, my deah. I never heard such a ridiculous statement in all my life,” Mrs. Bower said.

That gave me an idea for the next practice. I would play that character on the foolish side, as a woman who forms strong opinions in ignorance without taking the time to be fully informed.

Now that I had heard both Vivaldi and Bach, I had my own views on the subject.

But the most wonderful thing about Mrs. Bower was that one person out of a million and a half people on the isle of Manhattan cared enough to have a Cadbury bar, usually with fruit and nuts, waiting for me every other week.

Leave a Comment

Filed under memoir

taking opera critics on for size

I’m hoppin’ mad, my friends, and not just because it’s Easter week. What’s got me riled up this time?

Opera critics who are sizeists and use their pulpits–online and otherwise–to bash performers.

I happen to be an opera critic myself, reviewing for Bachtrack.com and sometimes on this blog. In something as complex and multi-faceted as an opera, there are myriad elements to critique  that are within bounds of a decent and competent opera review:

  • directorial vision
  • individual performances and interpretations
  • acting
  • singing
  • chemistry between performers
  • conducting and orchestral performance
  • composition
  • libretto
  • sets, lights, costumes
  • the marriage of all these elements
  • the theater
  • the seats
  • the intermission
  • the choice of opera
  • the supertitles

However, the mention of a performer’s size in a review because he or she is  perceived to be too big or too plump or too fat, criticizing a performer because of their shape and size is not within bounds of any reviewer’s purview and shouldn’t even be considered let alone mentioned.

Yet, here is one critic bringing size into his review of The Vancouver Opera’s recent production of The Barber of Seville. It is the most egregious example of  a review being completely out of bounds that I have ever seen since I began reviewing opera in 2010:

The chorus members are so fat and flabby that nobody in their right mind should put on public display so ugly a sight.  As my opera companion remarked: “That’s the best ad for an anti-fat farm I have ever seen.  Do you have to be fat to sing in opera?”

Are you as offended as I am? What right does this person have to comment on such things within the context of a review of a classical performance? Absolutely no right whatsoever. If I could nominate someone to be tarred and feathered and run out of Vancouver, this reviewer would top the list.

No one goes to opera to see supermodels. One goes to hear voices. If a performer has a physical attribute such as chubby legs or thin legs or buck teeth or a bald head or three heads, if the quality related to their appearance has nothing to do with their ability to sing the role and doesn’t interfere in the slightest with their ability to do so, than their physical appearance is not within bounds of a review.

I’m sure there are other examples of classless critics who abuse their privilege and station. I’m hard-pressed to think of one more offensive than the example I’ve given you above. But I’m certain there have been others.

In this age, when anyone who can start a blog has his or her own bully pulpit to espouse their “pink slime,” I’m sure there will be more offensive reviews and irresponsible and boorish reviewers because it’s just too tempting for people of poor character to show restraint and decency when they have cyberspace and the temptation to bash right at their fingertips.

And now you know what’s got me hoppin’ mad. Because there’s little that can be done to spare performers and opera companies from out-of-bounds reviews like that one.

3 Comments

Filed under Rant, Reviews